Giant Schnauzer Breed Magazine - Showsight


Let’s Talk Breed Education!



©Trish Keck

(A version of this article originally appeared as a series in "Giant Steps.")

T he Breed Standard for any par- ticular breed is both the blue- print and a schematic for that breed. It tells us how the breed should be constructed, and in some breeds, such as ours, how that breed should be “wired.” Our Standard does, indeed, devote a significant portion to the breed’s ideal temperament. When a judge enters the ring to pass judgment on our exhibits, the purpose is to select the best breeding stock. Each exhibit is judged against the ideal type for that breed, using the Standard for guidance. The Stan- dard alone is the measuring stick for the breed, and in theory, the individuals are not judged against one another; rather, by how well they conform as an indi- vidual to the Standard. The judge has been licensed by AKC to judge each breed that he or she has been hired to preside over. Judges are interviewed and tested on each Standard before being given the breed. The AKC Breed Standard belongs to, you guessed it, the AKC. The Standard is maintained by the recog- nized parent club, but any changes have to be approved by AKC. Changing the Standard is not an easy process

©Trish Keck

and should be carefully considered before diving into the process. The Judges’ Education Committee is charged with presenting the Standard to prospec- tive judges in a way that enables them to understand the nuances of the Stan- dard, and hopefully, have an understanding of breed type. It is not our place to rewrite the Standard or change it in any way. We simply apply it as written.



©Trish Keck

I would like to briefly touch on different aspects of the Giant Schnauzer Breed Standard, the reason for having a written Stan- dard, and how the Standard is applied by judges in the conforma- tion ring. Quotes directly from the Standard are in Bold Italic. GENERAL DESCRIPTION The General Description, basically, describes what a breed should look like and it offers a guideline for understanding breed type: The Giant Schnauzer should resemble, as nearly as pos- sible, in general appearance, a larger and more powerful ver- sion of the Standard Schnauzer, on the whole a bold and val- iant figure of a dog. Robust, strongly built, nearly square in proportion of body length to height at withers, active, sturdy and well muscled. Temperament which combines spirit and alertness with intelligence and reliability. Composed, watch- ful, courageous, easily trained, deeply loyal to family, playful, amiable in repose, and a commanding figure when aroused. The sound, reliable temperament, rugged build, and dense weather-resistant wiry coat make for one of the most useful, powerful, and enduring working breeds. This paragraph effectively describes both the physical and intellectual traits of the Giant Schnauzer, starting with the open- ing sentence. The breed does, in fact, resemble a larger, more powerful version of the Standard Schnauzer. The word “version” is important in this sentence because, although both breeds are basically square in proportion, the Standard Schanuzer appears a bit more compact than the Giant. I believe the reason for this lies in the genetic mixture of the Giant. The German Mastiff, now known as the Great Dane, is believed to have been part of the makeup of the Giant in order to gain height. This factor had the effect of giving the Giant a proportionally longer leg bone than that of the Standard Schnauzer. The second sentence states that the Giant is nearly square in proportion of body length to height at withers. Further into the Standard, the proportions given are exactly square, so this is actu- ally a minor discrepancy within our Standard. The third and fourth sentences in the General Description go into detail about the temperament that the Giant must possess. This aspect of our breed must never be diminished or disregarded, as it is such an integral part of what makes a Giant a Giant. The last sentence in the General Description eloquently puts into perspective why the combination of the Giant’s temperament,

its build, and its dense, weather-resistant, wiry coat make it such a versatile working dog. Note the order of important aspects listed in that sentence. I don’t think it is a coincidence that temperament is mentioned first. Remember the history of our breed and the purpose for which it was developed; driving cattle through the Bavarian Alps. Giants had to be strong enough to drive cattle as well as to protect both the cattle and the people who owned them. They had to possess enough stamina to move at a trot all day over rough terrain. These factors were combined to produce what we as fanciers have come to appre- ciate; an exceptionally versatile, working dog. I believe that any dog person not already introduced to the Giant could form a reasonably correct image of how the Giant appears, simply by reading the General Description. HEAD & NECK The Breed Standard states that the Head is: Strong, rectangular in appearance, and elongated; narrow- ing slightly from the ears to the eyes, and again from the eyes to the tip of the nose. The total length of the head is about one-half the length of the back (withers to set-on of tail). The head match- es the sex and substance of the dog. The top line of the muzzle is parallel to the top line of the skull; there is a slight stop which is accentuated by the eyebrows. Most of this is straight-forward. The point I wish to explore is the length of the head. The Standard states that it is “about” one- half the length of the back. The Standard does not indicate that the length of the head “must be at least” one-half the length of the back. I am concerned that exhibits should not be unnecessarily penal- ized for having too short a head. The Standard even goes so far as to define the back as being the distance from withers to set-on of tail. Considering that the set-on of tail is somewhat in front of the tail, the defined length is much shorter than the overall length of the body. As much as anyone, I appreciate a beautiful, long head. That detail is often the defining characteristic that can give a good exhibit the advantage it needs to win, when all else is equal. Gener- ally speaking, however, a dog shouldn’t be penalized if the head isn’t exaggerated. Other aspects of the head include the Skull, Cheeks, Bite, Ears, and Eyes: Skull - (Occiput to Stop). Moderately broad between the ears: occiput not too prominent. Top of skull flat; skin unwrinkled. Basically, the skull should not be dome shaped nor should there be a presence of excess skin.




Thank you to the amazing professional handlers who dedicate their lives to this sport and our Giant Schnauzers. We appreciate and thank all the judges who have supported our Giant Schnauzers through our years of breeding. Thank you to all the photographers for their craft taking photos we treasure.





GCH CH Aspen Leaf’s Axelle


GCHS CH Aspen Leaf’s Jacqueline Kennedy

DAUGHTER CH Aspen Leaf’s Cardamom Cleopatra

DAUGHTER GCHB CH Aspen Leaf’s Selectiondor Québécoise


*co-bred with Carol Pellerin

Our family trees

in success




LAGNIAPPE GIANT SCHNAUZERS La·gniappe : /lan’ yap/ - something given as a bonus or extra gift Holly & Chris Reed • Port Allen, LA •

Having owned Giants for over 30 years, Lagniappe is a small kennel, located on the banks of the Mississippi River in south Louisiana, dedicated to preserving and improving the conformation, health, and temperament of the Giant Schnauzer.








keen in expression with lids fitting tightly. Vision is not impaired nor eyes hidden by too long eyebrows. Many of us, myself included, tend to leave so much eyebrow that the eyes can’t be seen without pulling the hair back. The eyes really are beautiful and expressive. I’ve always felt that when I look into the eyes of a Giant, there’s an intelligent, soulful being looking back. Neck - Strong and well arched, of moderate length, blending cleanly into the shoulders, and with the skin fitting tightly at the throat; in harmony with the dog’s weight and build. Two words that I’d like to point out are “moderate” and “harmony.” The fact that it’s of moderate length and in harmony with the dog’s build all goes back to the fact that all aspects of this breed are predicated on its square, compact build. BODY Compact, substantial, short-coupled, and strong, with great power and agility. The height at the highest point of the withers equals the body length from breast- bone to point of rump. The loin section is well developed, as short as possible for compact build. A square build is the most efficient for a working dog, assuming all aspects are cor- rect. It’s imperative that the angulation of both front and rear assemblies is adequate, to ensure proper movement. Over-angulation creates movement faults in order to compen- sate for over-reaching, while under-angulation is not as efficient because it requires extra movement to accomplish the same forward locomotion. Understanding the build of a Giant requires one to have a basic familiarity with the history of the breed. It was bred specifically to drive cattle through the Bavarian Alps. It was also the protector of the farmers, their families, and their possessions. This is why we see adjectives such as strong, compact, robust, and moderate all used to describe the breed. It must be strong enough to accomplish its purpose and agile enough to trot across The forequarters have flat, somewhat sloping shoulders and high with- ers. Forelegs are straight and vertical when viewed from all sides with strong pasterns and good bone. They are separated by a fairly deep brisket which precludes a pinched front. The elbows are set close to the body and point directly backwards. Again, everything fits tightly and is in balance in order to allow this breed to work as efficiently as possible. The Bavarian farmers didn’t have ATVs with which to drive their cattle; relying instead on the acute ability of these magnificent Giant Schnauzers. Chest - Medium in width, ribs well sprung but with no tendency toward a bar- rel chest; oval in cross section: deep through the brisket. The breastbone is plainly discernible, with strong forechest; the brisket descends at least to the elbows, and ascends gradually toward the rear with the belly moderately drawn up. The ribs spread gradually from the first rib so as to allow space for the elbows to move close to the body. Again, this section continues the theme of having the power to accomplish what the breed was intended to do while maintaining the necessary agility and stamina. rough terrain all day. FOREQUARTERS Shoulders - The sloping shoulder blades (scapulae) are strongly muscled, yet flat. They are well laid back so that from the side the rounded upper ends are in a nearly vertical line above the elbows. They slope well forward to the point where they join the upper arm (humerus), forming as nearly as possible a right angle. Such an angu- lation permits the maximum forward extension of the forelegs without binding or effort. Both shoulder blades and upper arm are long, permitting depth of chest at the brisket.

©Gay Glazbrook

Cheeks - Flat, but with well-developed chewing muscles; there is no “cheekiness” to disturb the rectangular head appear- ance (with beard). How can the chewing muscles be well- developed without appearing cheeky? If you look from overhead, the cheeks shouldn’t protrude farther than the edges of the skull. Muzzle - Strong and well filled under the eyes: both parallel and equal in length to the topskull; ending in a moderately blunt wedge. The nose is large, black, and full. The lips are tight, and not overlap- ping, black in color. This is a very similar description to that of other breeds. The Doberman Pinscher Stan- dard is very similar, yet the Giant possesses a slightly broader muzzle that allows for large, strong teeth. Bite - A full complement of sound white teeth (6/6 incisors, 2/2 canines, 8/8 premo- lars, 4/6 molars) with a scissors bite. The upper and lower jaws are powerful and well formed. Disqualifying Faults - Over- shot or undershot. This is generally a strong suit of the breed. Giants typically have large, strong teeth, nice broad jaws, and good occlusion. Ears - When cropped, identical in shape and length with pointed tips. They are in balance with the head and are not exaggerated in length. They are set high on the skull and carried perpendicu- larly at the inner edges with as little bell as possible along the outer edges. When uncropped, the ears are V-shaped button ears of medium length and thickness, set high and carried rather high and close to the head. Uncropped ears are a little more difficult to judge as there are several possible faults; being long, houndy or carried too low. Eyes - Medium size, dark brown and deep-set. They are oval in appearance and



The total balance of front and rear angles utilized in a square dog is a very sensitive equation. If all components are in synch, the result is effi- ciency; if any part of the equation is not a good fit, the dog requires extra effort to move. Understanding the importance of the Giant’s ability to trot all day over rough terrain shows us why we must pay attention to these important details as breeders. BACK Short, straight, strong, and firm. This section is self-explanatory and fits into the overall picture con- cerning the necessary balance requested by our written standard. When I first started showing Giants, I noticed the poor toplines, first and fore- most. Many of the Giants at that time were high in the rear as a result of too little angulation in the rear. These specimens usually had a severe dip in the topline as well; this being the result of a difference in angulation from front to rear. Standing alertly, a Giant may have a slightly sloping topline, but it should remain flat when moving. A sloping topline when moving indicates more angulation in the rear than in the front. What the standard is about is balance and the ability to work. TAIL The tail is set moderately high and carried high in excitement. It should be docked to the second or not more than the third joint (approximately one and one-half to about three inches at maturity). This section is very specific. The docked tail should consist of either two or three joints. No guideline was established for undocked tails by the authors of the standard, leading us to believe that the concept was either not considered or it was rejected. Keep in mind that the standard includes descriptions for both cropped and uncropped ears. An undocked tail is not a listed disqualification, so how should a judge treat an undocked tail? Refer to the section on faults: The foregoing description is that of the ideal Giant Schnauzer. Any deviation from the above described dog must be penalized to the extent of the deviation. Since a full tail is quite a deviation from two or three joints, it must be considered a serious fault. Keep in mind that the judges should be making their picks by consider- ing how exhibits compare to the standard rather than through individual, personal tastes or convictions. Another common fault, discussed in the Illustrated Standard , is the gay or “squirrel” tail. An undocked tail is NOT a disqualification. However, a person wish- ing to show an undocked Giant must understand that it is a fault that must be overcome with sufficient overall quality and breed type. HINDQUARTERS The hindquarters are strongly muscled, in balance with the fore- quarters; upper thighs are slanting and well bent at the stifles, with the second thighs (tibiae) approximately parallel to an extension of the upper neckline. The legs from the hock joint to the feet are short, perpendicular to the ground while the dog is standing natu- rally, and from the rear parallel to each other. The hindquarters do not appear over-built or higher than the shoulder. Croup full and slightly rounded. We should always keep in mind the purpose for which this breed was developed; to drive cattle through the Bavarian Alps. Our Standard is predicated on that concept. The Giant must be strong and hardy enough to accomplish the assigned task. Dogs with weak or over-angulated rears cannot hold up over long days in rough terrain. A very common fault is sickle hocks. This is a product of incorrect bone lengths, and it greatly affects movement and stamina. Feet - Well arched, compact and catlike, turning neither in nor out, with thick tough pads and dark nails. This section is concise and to the point. Again, it describes what is necessary for a drover dog. Of course, the dark nails are a product of the strong pigment inherent in the breed.

Dewclaws - Dewclaws, if any, on hind legs should be removed; on the forelegs, may be removed. No comment is necessary for this section. GAIT The trot is the gait at which movement is judged. Free, balanced and vigorous, with good reach in the fore- quarters and good driving power in the hindquarters. Rear and front legs are thrown neither in nor out. When moving at a fast trot, a properly built dog will single- track. Back remains strong, firm, and flat. A trot is the working gait of the Giant. It was bred to work at this gait over rough terrain all day long. Efficient movement is absolutely necessary. Balance from front to rear is required to ensure the dog both reaches and drives. Common faults are poorly constructed fronts that flip or swing, and rears that have incorrect angles or long hocks. The back should be firm and flat when moving, though the topline may appear high-stationed while the dog is standing alert. The back is more likely to remain firm and flat when the dog is compact and balanced. COAT Hard, wiry, very dense; composed of a soft under- coat and a harsh outer coat which, when seen against the grain, stands slightly up off the back, lying neither smooth nor flat. Coarse hair on top of head; harsh beard and eyebrows, the Schnauzer hallmark.








We sincerely appreciate all the judges that recognized a Pepper Salt Giant that we feel possesses correct breed type. Hard coat, correct color, form and function are essential to the breed and variety! We would like to thank esteemed Judges Dr. Carmen L. Battaglia for awarding him his first major and Ms. Carolyn A. Herbel for awarding him with his second major by giving him BOB and then a group 2 in a beautiful lineup in the working group. Would also like to thank Hilde Haakensen for her friendship, mentoring, expert grooming and handling of this very special dog. Assisted by Noelle Silva




Let’s delve into one important aspect of our Standard; the Coat. I’m not sure why this subject seems to engender the most debate or why it seems to be hard to understand. The Standard is quite clear in its descrip- tion of the ideal Giant Schnauzer coat. Let’s go back to the origins of the Giant. This breed was developed in the Bavarian Alps to drive cattle and to protect livestock and the owners. Conditions and the elements predi- cated a serviceable coat to best protect the dogs while working. Now let’s look at this a little more closely. It is a double coat. When the coat is correct, it will consist of both the softer, insulating undercoat and the harsh, protective outer coat. Both elements are necessary in order to meet the desired effect. Generally speaking, when the dog is single-coated with only top or outer coat, it will not likely have a lot of leg furnishings. Likewise, if a dog has only undercoat, it will likely possess profuse, soft furnishings. These two likelihoods are not written in stone. The real test is whether the body coat is correct. The aforementioned two sentence sec- tion on coat says what about furnishings? It simply states that the beard and eyebrows are harsh. No mention is made of furnishings or leg hair. The judge has no guidance to penalize for either having furnishings or not having them, and should not care whether or not they are present. My personal feeling is such; if an exhibit of mine has furnishings, I would prefer they be well-trimmed so as not to interfere with the judge’s ability to see the dog’s movement. If the dog doesn’t move very well coming at you, it may make sense to use furnishings to cover. However, if it moves like a Sunbeam Mixmaster, it’s probably best not to draw undue atten- tion to this fact by having long, flowing furnishings blowing in the wind. We all have personal preferences. I’ve heard people state that a particu- lar breed, including our own, no longer performs the intended function or purpose for which it was originally bred. None of that matters when judg- ing dogs. As I’ve stated, what matters is what the standard says pertaining to the breeds. Hair may be pretty to some, but not to others. “Pretty” is a personal perception, but it is not part of our standard. To me, a pretty Giant is one that looks like a one-piece dog where all the parts fit together smoothly in a moderate, functional way. What’s important in the coat? “Hard, wiry, very dense; composed of a soft undercoat and a harsh outer coat…” Exclusion of either element is a fault. COLOR Solid black or pepper and salt. Only two colors are accepted; Black, and Pepper and Salt. Black – A truly pure black. A small white spot on the breast is per- missible; any other markings are disqualifying faults. The only marking allowed in the Black is a small spot on the chest. The Standard does not define what constitutes a small spot, so the guid- ance I offer is a spot approximately the size of a half dollar or smaller. Stray white hairs do not constitute a spot. An actual spot has white pig- mentation in the skin below. White or silver stickle hairs are common in the Giant Schnauzer. These are hairs that appear sporadically in the coat and are basically a whisker. They are not considered a fault, regardless of how many the dog possesses.

Pepper and Salt – Outer coat of a combination of banded hairs (white with black and black with white) and some black and white hairs, appearing gray from a short distance. Ideally, an intensely pigmented medium gray shade with “peppering” evenly distributed through- out the coat, and a gray undercoat. Acceptable: all shades of pepper and salt from dark iron-gray to silver-gray. Every shade of coat has a dark facial mask to emphasize the expression; the color of the mask harmonizes with the shade of the body coat. Eyebrows, whiskers, cheeks, throat, chest, legs, and under tail are lighter in color but include “peppering.” Markings are disqualifying faults. The Pepper and Salt coat is made up of banded hairs, which are black with white and white with black bands. The term for these banded hairs is “agouti.” These banded hairs are accompanied by black hairs and white hairs. This combi- nation of colors produces a gray coloration from a distance. Any shade of gray is acceptable, but all Pepper and Salt Giant Schnauzers must exhibit a darker gray mask. Although the legs, under the throat, and other points are lighter in color, markings are not allowed. These lighter areas include “pep- pering” of darker hairs and, when closely examined, are not actual markings. HEIGHT The height at the withers of the male is 25-1/2 inches to 27-1/2 inches, and of the female, 23-1/2 to 25-1/2 inches, with the mediums being desired. Size alone should never take precedence over type, balance, soundness, and tem- perament. It should be noted that too small dogs gener- ally lack the power and too large dogs, the agility and maneuverability desired in the working dog. The section concerning heights is short and simple. Bitches should be 23-1/2” to 25-1/2” at the withers while dogs should be 25-1/2” to 27-1/2” with the mediums being desired. The reason given for this average is strength, cou- pled with agility for the performance of duties. Most of our Giants are either at the top of the standard or over. Keeping in mind that we are given a two-inch variance in each sex with mediums being desired, how much over the limit would be considered a serious fault? If we stretch the limit by another two inches, wouldn’t this be a serious devia- tion? This would probably constitute a serious fault, but we have to remember that the standard says that size alone should never take precedence over type, balance, soundness, and temperament. There is no measurement because there is no disqualification for size. Size is certainly a consideration in the overall judging process, and cannot be disregarded, but we seem to get plenty of latitude in this area.



The written Standard for any breed is the blueprint for that breed. The Standard is in place to ensure that the traits associated with that breed are maintained in order to preserve that breed. The purpose of conformation judging is to choose the breeding stock that best exhibits those traits. The concept of conformation judging is simple: One person, serving as the judge while having a working understanding of that breed’s Standard, chooses the exhibits that best exemplify the image created by the written Stan- dard. In any given competition, the Standard used is the particular Standard for that breed and is endorsed by the registry holding the event. In our case, the registry is the American Kennel Club. The judge is obligated to follow the Official Breed Standard to the best of his or her understanding. The Breed Standard that we use was originally written by the Pinscher Schnauzer Klub in Germany. These were people who had a hand in the development of the breed. They had a vision of what the ideal Giant Schnauzer should look like and transferred this vision into written word. This breed was developed by humans to perform certain tasks on behalf of humans. This took place in a particular region of the world during a particular period in history. To sum up this article, “type” is always the main consideration when judging. Knowing what constitutes type is the key to cor- rectly choosing the best breeding stock. The Giant Schnauzer is a square-built dog of medium size with a rough coat, harsh beard and eyebrows, and a frame that supports trotting over rough ter- rain for hours. Not to be overlooked is the temperament. Tem- perament is featured in the General Description, the section on Size, and the section on Faults. Half of the General Description is devoted to the subject. Temperament is one of the most important factors in determining breed type and should NEVER be over- looked. If we lose temperament, we have lost the breed’s ability to work and, in effect, the breed. All aspects of the Breed Standard point back to the breed’s orig- inal purpose. The history of the breed is the key to understanding the Standard.

FAULTS The foregoing description is that of the ideal Giant Schnau- zer. Any deviation from the above described dog must be penal- ized to the extent of the deviation. The judge shall dismiss from the ring any shy or vicious Giant Schnauzer. This section of the Breed Standard deals with faults starting with the “extent of deviation” yardstick we use to determine how serious any particular fault should be considered. Shyness - A dog shall be judged fundamentally shy if, refus- ing to stand for examination, it repeatedly shrinks away from the judge; if it fears unduly any approach from the rear; if it shies to a marked degree at sudden and unusual noises. Viciousness - A dog that attacks or attempts to attack either the judge or its handler is definitely vicious. An aggres- sive or belligerent attitude towards other dogs shall not be deemed viciousness. DISQUALIFICATIONS Overshot or undershot. Markings other than specified. The Breed Standard states that the judge SHALL dismiss from the ring any shy or vicious Giant Schnauzer and it succinctly defines both shyness and viciousness. Most judges will give a pup- py more than one chance to stand for exam, and judges may use discretion interpreting whether a dog is fundamentally shy. The disqualifications are few and are clearly stated, though mark- ings can confuse newer judges. Hopefully, those questions were answered in the Coat and Color discussion. SUMMARY Purebred dogs, in general, are breeds developed by humans to exhibit certain desired traits that set them apart from other breeds. These purebreds did not “happen into existence” purely by natural selection. Most physical traits are the product of genetics. Groom- ing, cropping, and docking aspects are distinctly controlled by the human hand. These issues were originally based on practical appli- cation rather than aesthetic value.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR Steve Fox has been in dogs for more than 40 years and involved with the Giant Schnauzer since 1985. Steve has bred over 120 Giant Schnauzers that finished their AKC championship titles, including a number of All-Breed BIS winners. Steve handled the great CH Ruster’s Dark Command, “Koal,” to more than 45 BIS and three consecutive National Specialty wins. He has also handled several other Giant Schnauzers to BIS and National Specialty wins. Steve’s foundation bitch was the #2 All-Time, All-Breeds, Top-Producing Dam in AKC history. Steve served as GSCA President and, most recently, as the Judges’ Education Committee Chair. Steve is always willing to help and has many stories and memories to share if you have the time to listen and learn! Steve has been a member of the Giant Schnauzer Club of America since 1987.













Mary E. Falls • S 5560 Bluff Road, Baraboo, WI 53913 • 608-356-6642 •

AKC Breeder of Merit Proven top quality working show dogs with foundation European bloodlines. Emphasis on correct structure, sound temperament, health, athletic ability and genetic diversity.

Thanks to Booth Photography




By Olga Gagne

Origin & History E

arly accounts of the Giant Schnauzer state that the breed was developed in the kingdoms of Wurttemburg and Bavaria in southern Ger- many. It was a farm herding

type of dog, multi-hued, mostly black in color, but sometimes a yellow or reddish color, or pepper-salt or gray. In 1876, the “Bavarian Wolf Hund” was described as a strong, black or black-brown dog with rough or shaggy coat, strong chest, distin- guishing itself by its courage, by holding together herds of hogs and cattle and by being particularly fit for protection from hostile attacks. It was an established breed by the end of the nineteenth century, but the few breeders were extremely secretive, never revealing their breeding records, nor o ff er- ing outside stud services or selling their dogs. It is theorized that the early Giant Schnauzer was developed from crosses with smooth-coated drovers, rough-coated shepherd dogs, black Great Danes and Bouviers des Flanders. Also, it is further suggested that because the resultant dog resembled a larger edition of the already well-known and older Standard Schnau- zer, an infusion of Standard Schnauzer blood was given to reinforce type.

4 )08 4 *()5 . "(";*/& " 13*- t

Th ere was a conglomeration of types, colors, hair textures, and sizes. After this, as the type came closer to that of the Standard Schnauzer, the name Giant Schnauzer was adopted. Gradually breed- ers selected two color varieties, black and pepper/salt, with the black soon becom- ing dominant. Th e Giant Schnauzer made slow prog- ress in North America when it was first imported in the 1920s. He arrived at the time the German Shepherd Dog was at the peak of his popularity. Th e AKC gave them recognition in 1930 and the CKC had the first two Giants registered in 1934. Form & Function—Character Th e Giant Schnauzer has always been praised for his intelligence. Along with his spirit, alertness and reliability, the Giant has a robust and agile build. Although, his name is “Giant”, this is not technically a giant breed. He is simply the largest of the three Schnauzer breeds, being the giant among them. While the Standard Schnauzer has been held strictly to its original size by setting a disqualification in the standard, the size of the Giant has been allowed to increase gradually over the past thirty years, from a range of 21 ½" -25 ½" , to the present 23 ½" -25 ½" for females and 25 ½" - 27 ½" for males. For the show ring, size

might seem impressive, but few breeders and owners want to see the Giant push- ing the maximums. Th e standard clearly states mediums preferred. In his duties as police and army service, he must have the weight and strength for “man-work”. If he is too large and heavy, he would lack the required speed and agility. If too slight and light, he would lack the power. Th e primary function of a Giant Schnauzer these days is being a devoted family member, a guardian of the home and an enthusiastic performance dog. Th ese functions require a dog with a sound temperament and a reliable, responsive disposition. Giant Schnauzers are an excel- lent choice for those wanting a willing and active companion, but they are not the right choice for everyone. Th ey are a domi- nant dog and can quickly take control if given the chance. It is essential they learn basic obedience and understand their posi- tion in the household, which is their pack. Th eir legal position in this pack is below all the humans. Once the order is established, they are great family dogs and reliable, devoted companions. Although they are alert and watchful towards strangers, they are basically non-aggressive and are excel- lent natural guard dogs. Th ey are most happy when they are with you, having a willingness to please. Th ey do best with mental stimulation and lots of exercise.

In 1909, the breed was first exhibited in Munich, Germany, as Reisenschnau- zers, the name they are still given today in Europe. Th e dogs were also called Muchener, or Munich Schnauzers, because of their popularity in the town of Munich. Even at this early first show, the judge was confronted with two di ff erent types of coat. Along with the rough coat- ed dogs, there were exhibits with long, smooth hair, dubbed Russerls or Bear Schnauzers. In the end, a coarsely haired black male, was chosen as the best repre- sentative of the breed. Th e Giant Schnauzers characteristics were greatly valued by the local stock breeders, butchers, and brewery owners, his greatest asset being that of a steadfast guard. As well as being used to herd and move the livestock, his intelligence and sharpness was used to guard his master’s possessions and to accompany and pro- tect wagons in travel. With the decline of cattle driving, the Giant Schnauzer’s strong agile body, active, alert, and reliable temperament, made him noticed by the police and law enforcement services, and he soon began a new career in the field of guard and police work. In 1925, the breed received o ffi cial designation in Germany as a working dog. In 1910, called the birth year of the Giant Schnauzer, the German Stud Book entered 9 Munich Schnauzers. Four were pepper/salt, three were black, one was brown/yellow and one was grey/yellow.

continued on page 190

t4 )08 4 *()5 . "(";*/& " 13*- 


of champion Giant Schnauzers making their mark at Westminster and beyond.

CH Aspen Leaf’s Wild Heart of Tatyana

GCH CH Lindsayleigh’s Batman

*bred by Derrick Wood

CH Aspen Leaf’s Selectiondor La Celestina

*co-bred with Carol Pellerin

Loyal, loving, and athletic show, farm and home dogs




in success

Our family trees



continued from page 178

be strong, well arched, of moderate length and not directly upright of the shoulders. Fronts have always been a weakness in the breed. Th e correct shoulder angu- lation, with proper return of upper arm, broad chest and strong sternum is very much desired. Th e Giant Schnauzer is not a terrier and it should have no appearance of a terrier front. A properly built Giant Schnauzer will move smoothly, covering ground with long e ffi cient strides, dem- onstrating good reach, to balance a strong driving rear. A dog that lowers his head and turns his ears back when in full stride is “First of all, it must be understood that the Giant is a working dog. He was bred for a purpose and HIS SIZE MUST REFLECT THIS.”

Many Giant Schnauzers are still in careers of service to man. Th ey are used in police and army forces for tracking, guarding and protection. Search and res- cue Giant Schnauzers were deployed in the 1985 earthquake in Mexico City and the 911 attack in New York City. Currently, they are successful participants in every known dog activity, pet/people therapy, agility, obedience, backpacking, carting, drug and bomb detection, herding, schutz- hund, sledding, skijoring, tracking and boating—just to name a few. Th ey are a versatile, willing working dog. Judging Considerations Th e Giant Schnauzer can be a confus- ing breed to understand. Th ere are many di ff erent visual inconsistencies that meet the eye. First of all, it must be understood that the Giant is a working dog. He was bred for a purpose and his size must reflect this. He should be strongly built, sturdy and well muscled. Th e standard states, “A robust, more heavy set than a slender dog”. He should have more bone than a Dober- man and less than a Rottweiler. Th e desire for elegance and eye appeal in the show ring should not allow a build that is tall and narrow, too slight or racy or weedy. In an analogy to the horse, a Giant Schnauzer should be compact with plenty of substance for his size, like a Quarter horse or Polo pony. He should neither be like a heavy

draft horse, or like a tall, long-legged Th or- oughbred race horse. Th e Giant Schnauzer must be agile and quick on his feet, having himself all together when gaited on a loose lead, as well as when stacked or posed. In being a sturdy dog, the Giant should have a strong head. It should appear to be large and su ffi ciently wide to accommodate strong cheek muscles without being bulky. And, for this head, which is half the length of the back, the neck must be strong also. Th e tall, elegant specimen, with a narrow long head and a thin exaggerated neck is not the breed’s outline. Th e neck should

t4 )08 4 *()5 . "(";*/& " 13*- 

maximizing e ffi ciency in his movement and should not be penalized. Often, show speci- mens move about the ring, head and ears at attention. Th is movement is not conducive to good reach and good driving power. Th e subject of much confusion and of the most questions asked is the one of coat. Variance in coat type has always been an issue in the breed, as read even in the early origins. Th e genetic pool already consisted of harder coated dogs and softer more profusely coated ones. A body coat that is dense, weather resistant and wiry is called for. Th e standard is not very descriptive in defining furnishings that are shaped and trimmed on the legs of the dog. Breeders dedicated to showing Giants, work hard to maintain the proper texture on the body of the dog and yet have a dog with leg fur- nishings to shape. Often two types of dogs will be seen. Th ey have been dubbed the European ‘hard-coat’, and the American ‘soft-coat’. Actually, in visual observation, one could call the European ‘hard-coat’, the ‘short coat’, and the American ‘soft-coat’, the ‘long coat’. Th e hard coat, or short coated dog, will have less length and thickness in the leg furnishings. Th e soft coat, or long coated dog, will have leg furnishings that are much longer and thicker. On these dogs, it is necessary to conduct a thorough hands on examination to determine the body under the coat. When observing these dogs in motion, be aware of how the movement and grooming of the furnishings can disguise the

actual line of the dogs’ legs. A good moving dog might not look as clean moving and a bad moving dog will look better, depending on the skill of the groomer! No matter what length of hair is seen on the legs, the body hair should be strong, hard and wiry, with a dense undercoat. It is important to remem- ber, that in evaluating Giants, they are com- posed of many parts, and the coat is just one of them. Th e animal should be judged as a whole. Coat should not be the only reason to penalize an exhibit if the dog excels in other virtues, especially when judged against inferior animals that excel only in coat. And, on the other hand, harder coated dogs must not be dismissed because they lack the fancy, profuse furnishings of the elegant dogs that are well sculpted and immaculately present- ed. A sound body and a good temperament are of utmost importance! Health Concerns Th e Giant Schnauzer has been known as a relatively healthy breed compared to some others. Th eir average life expectancy is twelve years, which is reasonably good for a large dog. Since the early imports, a major con- cern has been hip dysplasia. With concerted e ff orts on the part of all the early breeders, the breed maintains a good percentage of dysplastic free dogs. Certified hip clearanc- es still are, and always will be, a necessary requirement in breeding programs. Hypo- thyroidism, epilepsy, toe cancer and urinary incontinence are also concerns. Th ese and

other disorders are health conditions that are known to exist in many breeds and are not limited to the Giant Schnauzer alone. Breed- ers are diligent in following health tests and certifications on their dogs. Th e Giant Schnauzer is a versatile breed, making a smooth transition from the farms of Europe to the homes in North America. It has been lucky enough to be desired by people who appreciate its unique quali- ties. It has been dubbed “the dog with the human brain”. More information can be found at Giant Schnauzer Club of America’s web site, http://

BIO Olga Gagne is from Canada. She has bred and shown Giants since the mid-seventies under the Bluechip prefix. Her dogs have won Multi

BISS and BIS, were top in their breed for many years and Top Working in 1988. Olga Gagne is President of Giant Schnau- zer Club of Canada and an AKC approved mentor for the breed. She served on the Giant Schnauzer Club of America’s com- mittee which compiled the breed’s I llus- trated Standard . In 1998, she began judg- ing and is currently approved to judge six groups in Canada. Olga Gagne has judged both the American and Canadian Giant Schnauzer National Specialties. 4 )08 4 *()5 . "(";*/& " 13*- t



interference and quality control. 1970 started in dogs, Dober- mans and Giant Schnauzers. 1978 started showing. 1991 started judging. JAY RICHARDSON

I live in Pittsburgh, PA. I run my boarding kennel and I deal in real estate. I was a professional handler for 28 years, judging 27 years. KLAUS & JOAN ANSELM We live in Keswick, Virginia just outside of Charlottesville. We both enjoy travel and are on the road as often as possible. I am a tapestry weaver, very busy in my studio designing and weaving. My work (website: is in pri- vate and public collections in this country and in Europe. We both grew up with dogs and have been active in the dog show world since 1964. We have both been judging for 30 years. LINDA FOWLER

I live in Elgin, IL about 45 minutes west of O’Hare. I try and manage the kid’s schedules. I have been showing dogs since I was 10 years old, my parents raised Poodles. I have been judg- ing since 1994.

1. Describe the breed in three words. BA: Elegant, statuesque and impressive.

K&JA: Robust, robust, robust. LF: After the obviously required breed traits—strength, bal- ance, sound temperament.

I am presently retired, but see the attached bio, submitted to the GSCA prior to my judging. I obtained my first show dog—a Newfoundland— in 1976 and owner-handled him to his Championship. Several years later got my first Giant—EL LOBO UNIQUE—also owner-handled to her Championship. Since 1986 have been a Portuguese Water Dog breed- er. I have been judging since 1990.

GM: Beautiful, loyal and trustworthy. JR: Powerful, robust and intelligent.

2. What are your "must have" traits in this breed? BA: Bone, body, correct coat, correct movement. K&JA: Substance, stocky build, Schnauzer type. LF: Breed type (as per the standard, not what is "in style"), balanced effortless movement, sound temperament. GM: Wire double coat, long dry chiseled head, substance with a solid top line with slightly rounded croup. JR: Proper bone and substance, correct make and shape, cor- rect temperament and correct hair. 3. Are there any traits in this breed you fear are becoming exaggerated? BA: Too much trimming and incorrect coat. K&JA: Elegance, poor coat quality, lack of substance. LF: None specifically, but believe that the grooming is becoming over-exaggerated—dyed coats, etc. GM: Incorrect soft coats.


I reside in Edgewater, Fl and my summers in New Hamp- shire where I was born. Currently retired; principal electron- ic engineer by profession, specializing in electromagnetic

t4 )08 4 *()5 . "(";*/& + "/6"3: 

JR: Trimming is always an issue, but in this breed it is usu- ally poor trimming and coat instead of over trimming. One sees exaggerated outlines,meaning long backs, overangulated rears, length of muzzles andback skulls have become exaggerated in length. 4. Do you think the dogs you see in this breed are better now than they were when you first started judging? Why or why not? BA: The breed is most definitely better today; we have so many wonderful breeders totally dedicated to the breed. K&JA: Yes, thanks due to a few dedicated breeders, although there is still a lot of room for improvement. LF: Now overall (not any specific dogs), when I first started judging, the rears were a weak point. When they improved, the fronts seemed to become very nar- row? With what I have seen recently, there has been an improvement at both "ends". I did point out at the National that although bites overall were acceptable, there is a need to keep an eye on the occlusions of side teeth, which is instrumental in maintaining the required scissor bite. GM: They have greatly improved, much better: tempera- ments, top lines, movement. JR: No, overall there are seldom more than one or two in an entry that are real quality. As I mentioned above coats are a major problem, I believe the dogs could have good coats if worked correctly. As with many terrier breeds at this time it is hard to find people willing to put that much time and effort into it. 5. Why do we see so few salt & pepper Giants in top competition? BA: I not know why not many salt peppers. K&JA: Lack of commitment by breeders, limited gene pool. LF: I have no idea, but have seen some lovely "pepper and salts" and awarded them appropriately. GM: There has only been one instance where I would have given a point to a Salt/Pepper. Their heads and eyes do not demonstrate their mental toughness. JR: That is a question for the breeders, In the past year I think I just had one. He ran around the ring as fast as could be, ears pinned back, tail completely tucked and had hair about 3-4 inches long. 6. What do you think new judges misunderstand about the breed? BA: I think some are of the opinion that they are big Miniatures; they don’t take time to learn the purpose of the Giants—their working ability and their intended purpose.

K&JA: For anybody interested in the breed, please attend a National Specialty. LF: Coats, body proportions, the work they were bred to do. GM: Judges may fall prey to the well-furnished, soft-coated flashiness. JR: The make and shape, compactness, temperaments. “there iS nothing thAt exciteS me more thAn A LARGE 7. Is there anything else you’d like to share about the breed? Please elaborate. BA: I think they are beautiful—a lot of work goes into the presentation, but the breeders and exhibitors of this breed as a whole are so devoted the Giant Schnauzer. The breed is sometimes a total work of art and a truly beautiful site is to watch one move around the ring very beautiful. LF: I believe that overall the Giant breeders have done an excellent job in improving and maintaining their breed. GM: There is nothing that excites me more than a large ring full of Giants. They are just beautiful, that is why I was attracted to them years ago. JR: This is a wonderful breed that should command the ring with its style and temperament. 8. And, for a bit of humor, what’s the funniest thing you’ve ever experienced at a dog show? BA: There are too many funny things, I could write a book! LF: There are many instances, but years ago when I was showing my Giant bitch against a dog, the dog proceeded to lift his leg and urinate on the judge! It was an easy win that day! GM: I asked an exhibitor to take her dog around in a small circle and to come back from where she started; she did a small pirouette and looked at me, I asked again to go further and she went around a 2 foot circle. I did not ask her again. Another instance many years ago: a person asked me to hold their Irish setter, as soon as the owner left the dog peed all over my legs. Not funny at the time. RING FULL OF GIANTS.”

4 )08 4 *()5 . "(";*/& + "/6"3: t

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30

Powered by